|
Zupka010296
|
Posted Sept. 3, 2026, 8:31 p.m.
Edited by Zupka010296 Sept. 3, 2026, 9:02 p.m.
My Dear Friends from INT 7! In 9 days, we will celebrate the first anniversary of INT 7, which launched on September 12, 2025. I believe this is the time when we should seriously discuss INT 7. I also believe that the entire CRATR, especially CVD, should help us make this newest server the best KnightFight server possible, attracting as many active players as possible. Unfortunately, I'm afraid CRATR hasn't prepared any celebrations or events. There's a lot of room for improvement. Perhaps a contest? Maybe a competition? Maybe prizes for active players? Maybe a server war? Maybe some interesting changes? For my part, I'd like to launch an initiative called "reconciliation and agreement on INT 7." This requires CRATR's help. Over the past three months, numerous accounts have disappeared and been deleted on INT 7—ranging from level 30 to 100. These were players from every guild and every country. We were particularly hurt by the removal of two players at almost level 100, the removal of two players from one guild during a major war, and the deletion of the accounts of a French family. Of course, we understand that these players committed some minor offenses. However, the "death penalty" for them is too harsh a punishment. What are the consequences? Activity on the server has dropped significantly. Many players from INT 7 don't want to play on next server like INT 8, they are tired of the INT 6 and 7 that were created in such a short time. We want to continue to stay on INT 7. Let's take care of this server. Therefore, on the occasion of the first anniversary of INT 7's launch, I am making an official request to CRATR. On this occasion, please help us restore INT 7's glory. Please grant all removed players a "right of clemency." Allow anyone who has lost a knight for violating the rules to have it restored. Let's treat all the penalties imposed as a kind of "warning." This will be a very friendly gesture on your part for us, the INT 7 community. We are not cheaters. We are people who have been playing and supporting KF for over 20 years. On the occasion of the 1st anniversary of the INT 7 server, please give us a chance. Restore our INT 7 accounts and give us a second chance 🙏🙏🙏. |
|
NocnySokol
|
Posted Sept. 3, 2026, 9:19 p.m.
Edited by NocnySokol Sept. 3, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
|
|
Nimoe
|
Posted Sept. 3, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
@Zupka010296 Very nicely written; I fully support this. We, too, would like to have our Kaya and Loki back. Losing the two of them hit us hard; even though Loki is a bit of a daredevil, he is a fantastic player—despite a few actions that weren't exactly okay. And I still miss Kaya, as she was a very good friend of mine. I would also love to see our French friends return. They were always helpful, and I appreciate every single one of them. I’d be in favor of an "anniversary server war"—that would be fitting for the one-year mark. And please, no new game worlds—as was very well described above—because nobody has any desire to keep starting over from scratch. |
|
Zupka010296
|
Posted Sept. 4, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
I love you Nimoe ❤️ I hope we will see again our entire community of INT 7 (nevermind if they were friends or foes) like at the beginning of the server. INT 7 is our homeland and sometimes the weather is cloudy and full of darkness, but we are sure that the sun will arise soon. Those players who are already lost could make KnightFight great again ⚔️⚔️⚔️💪💪💪🙏🙏🙏 They are worth players that most of us knows for many years. In my opinion most of players fron our server suffer, because such a waste. I am sure if they back on INT 7 or get a chance to back, they will use it to make server more active and competitor. It's all what we want. |
|
Nimoe
|
Posted Sept. 4, 2026, 1:37 a.m.
@Zupka010296
I feel the same way: the game world needs to be preserved. Every player has invested a lot there, but unfortunately, a lot has happened that caused many to lose interest in the game. If the banned players were allowed to return, that would be a start. CRATR should be willing to turn a blind eye in this regard. We rely on every active player. Sure, anyone who messes up deserves a ban, but not a permanent one; players should get the chance to return with their banned accounts. We mustn't forget the members of the "Chaos" guild, either—they are affected too and should be allowed to play again. I would really love to see new events like server wars; they were fantastic and in a completely different league than guild wars—especially because you suddenly find yourself fighting alongside the very people you might have just faced in a guild war moments earlier. Constantly creating new game worlds cannot be the solution for Kf. |
|
Doom75
|
Posted Sept. 4, 2026, 7:38 a.m.
I can’t agree with your request because it simply doesn’t make any sense. Failing to follow the game’s rules, just like breaking the law in real life, has consequences and restoring deleted characters belonging to cheaters would send the wrong message to the other players who do follow the rules. If someone chose to break the rules (for example, by botting, having multiple characters or operating multiple farm characters etc.) and got caught then they should absolutely face the consequences. |
|
cvd
CRATR.games
|
Posted Sept. 4, 2026, 11:22 a.m.
Edited by cvd Sept. 4, 2026, 11:25 a.m.
Hey INT 7 🛡️ First off, congrats on getting this world to nearly a year. Twenty-plus years of KF experience between you all in this thread alone, and a community small enough that most of you know each other by name (and by scar). That's rare, and it's worth something. We read every word here. Here's where we stand on the amnesty question: No blanket pardons. We won't restore every deleted or banned account across the board, and we won't pretend that's a satisfying answer. But it's the honest one. Bans are never a decision we take lightly. Nobody at CRATR enjoys pulling a knight off the board, especially one that's been fighting for years. When we ban, it's because the evidence left us no better option, not because we want the server quieter. There are always two sides. We know that. Forum threads and guild chat only ever show one angle. So do our logs, honestly, just a different one. That's exactly why we don't hand out group verdicts. Every player is an individual case. Kaya, Loki, "Chaos," the French family, everyone named here, we're not going to judge or discuss any of it in public. But if you (or someone speaking for you) believes a ban was wrong or too harsh, open a support ticket and ask us to look again. We will, on its own merits. That's the honest offer we can make on INT 7's anniversary: not a clean slate for everyone, but a fair look for anyone who asks. Steel and banners, |
|
p_b
|
Posted Sept. 4, 2026, 12:17 p.m.
Aprreciate CVD's comments on this one - I too would be against a blanket amnesty on any world simply due to the fact that it sends out completely the wrong message to people willing to try to bend the rules in the future. that said - while I applade the INT7 folks trying to generate interest etc, there are many many other worlds that could also benefit some sort of "spruce up" in terms of generating interest and activity. IMO it's wrong to keep only ever focusing on the latest world, as again it reinforces the perspective that our old worlds "don't matter". (EG why shouldn't I have the chance to take part in a server war that is funded by CRATR and gives me MC's just for taking part - there's likely to be fewer of us involved so I get a bigger pot/chance etc). And I'm not saying this out of sour grapes, but I truly feel that all worlds deserve love, not just the newest ones - the gameplay loop is no different on these old ones... |
|
Zupka010296
|
Posted Sept. 4, 2026, 1:05 p.m.
Thank you, CVD, for your sincere response. This form of communication is honest, even regardless of the stated position. No one likes to be ignored, and engaging in dialogue generates a positive response in the community. Also thank you CVD, for trying to see things from the players' perspective, not just the administration's. Sometimes these perspectives are completely different. If you promise that CRATR will re-evaluate the matter (if someone submits such a request in an individual case), then that's fair. Perhaps the first anniversary of the INT 7 server will help our entire community (both players and CRATR) find a common solution for the good of the server. |
Lila
|
Posted Sept. 5, 2026, 5:41 a.m.
Bringing back all those accounts that cheated their way to the top just to boost activity? You can’t be serious. 😂 |
|
Nimoe
|
Posted Sept. 5, 2026, 10:28 a.m.
Edited by Nimoe Sept. 5, 2026, 10:32 a.m.
The point is that some accounts might warrant a re-examination—though, as Doom rightly explained, others don't, given that they involve multiple accounts, bot usage, and so on. Since we aren't behind the scenes—as cvd aptly pointed out—we players can't know exactly what led to the bans. It was simply a request from Zupka010296—a reasonable one, in my view, provided it doesn't involve the kind of players Doom described. The server is pretty much wrecked; there isn't much life left in it as things stand. And after a year, that’s a pretty grim outcome. |
Lila
|
Posted Sept. 5, 2026, 11:21 a.m.
Not to mention account sharing and account sitting...😉 |
|
Page:
1
You need to login to add a post.
|
|---|
@Doom75
That’s true, but that wasn’t the case with Loki—even though his final action wasn’t right either; however, that isn’t the issue here.
I cannot judge the situation regarding the other two suspended or deleted members, nor that of the French players or anyone else.
As for botting, multi-boxing, playing multiple farming characters simultaneously, etc., I agree with you, since the forum rules state that violations can lead to account deletion.
A decision should be made based on the nature of the violations as to whether a permanent suspension (deletion) is appropriate or if a temporary ban suffices.
Since we are not privy to the details of the violations in the respective cases—and this is a matter concerning only the player involved and CRATR—the suggestion was simply that the duration of certain bans might potentially be reduced, provided the violations that led to the ban were not overly severe.
And that these players would then have their old accounts reactivated, rather than having to create a new character from scratch.