Ostaszewianin
|
Posted Sept. 30, 2023, 9:11 p.m.
It's a matter of 3 minutes of programmer work - removing the appropriate formula in the game code. And this problem, which has been raised by many players for years, is ignored by the game producer. We have (maybe?) freedom and equality in choosing the development of a knight build. Whether it's 2h, armored 1h, or tank - it's my conscious decision and I can't be punished for it. |
ga_ning5
|
Posted Oct. 9, 2023, 2:38 a.m.
I see no probelm with turtle builds when 2H players are given a clear advantage over 1H lol |
Page:
1
You need to login to add a post.
|
---|
When you say remove the armour penalty - do you mean for real turtle builds?
I personally wouldn't want that - at high levels a turtle 1H is uncrackable, so you end up with loads of undecided fights, they can hoard coins at will and have a massive advantge in progression as a result.
That was why the penalty was added in the first place.