English German Italian French Spanish Polish Czech Portuguese Brazilian Portuguese Russian Slovak moonID.net - Please discuss stuff about moonID here → Ideas → About Updates

Perhaps instead of slowing down the Battleground, we could consider speeding up the game server.
The Battleground system is currently working well. I think it has a limit, ending at 99 stars. This could be improved.

In addition, a server update could be coming.
Let's say our character is level "x."

When attacking someone level "x+1" and winning, you get 2 XP.

When attacking someone level "x+2" and winning, you get 3 XP.

When attacking someone level "x+3" and winning, you get 4 XP.

When attacking someone level "x+4" and winning, you get 5 XP.

Or, we could change this to:

When attacking someone level "x+6" and winning, you get 3 XP.

When attacking someone level "x+7" and winning, you get 4 XP.

When attacking someone level "x+8" and winning, you get 5 XP.

This would help close the level gap within the server. This would maintain competition and the liveliness of the server.

Additionally, I think stat boosting with MC should be discouraged or limited. For example, it should only be done on the first day a character starts on the server, i.e., registration day, and there should be a limit to this so it doesn't become a game for those with money. My humble opinion.

There's a serious imbalance in 1H shield items. Shields that can be purchased with MC are the same as shields purchased with gold at the next level. I've included an example image below.
[img]https://resmim.net/cdn/2025/10/17/j7DMq8.png[/img]
[img]https://resmim.net/cdn/2025/10/17/j7mvO6.png[/img]
[img]https://resmim.net/cdn/2025/10/17/j7DZH2.png[/img]

This has been mentioned before, but I want to emphasize it. 1H characters both boost stats and spend more gold. Furthermore, the items they purchase cost more in both gold and MC. This needs to be addressed.

If you want to revitalize the game, try creating a continuation of the items. KnightFight didn't even have this many items when it first launched. Some were added later. This has been done before and can be done again. Please work on this.

I also think the forum rules need to be revised. Insulting someone on the forum shouldn't go unpunished. For example, they shouldn't be able to log into their server account for three days. I think similar deterrent measures could be taken.

And finally, a forum where we can communicate effectively. We won't have to search for who's posting where. Believe me, this will make your job easier, too.

The main issue with the Homeworld XP system, is that once you get to the "the top" level wise - whether that's a new world or an old one - Your XP growth slows to a trickle; because there just aren't enough targets to hit to get 2xp let alone 8. (I have one other account that I can beat "sometimes" based on RNG)

I made a suggestion informally that one approach could be a complete overhaul of the BG currently.

Instead of zombies and that BE limit once a <insert time period that's practical - I went with Month> every knight's account on every world is loaded in.

We create our session on our home world and we have access to every single knight in the whole game.
(search would need to be adjusted as my homeworld has 10k accounts, so this would be a lot of data we'd need to filter)

Nominal gold rewards paid out per win (based on some sort of forumula TBD) and XP is like it was for BP's. (aka little reward for baby seal clubbing)

End of the month we get to see our bragging rights "Oh best knight in US1 beat UK1 etc etc) & we get to fight "real" accounts.

A further development of that theory could look to having a way for truly server wide wars - some sort of "special" area for BG based wars (though may get trickier to police with multi-accounts etc).